This report summarizes key developments in EU health policy during Q4 2025, covering the period from 6 October 2025 to 28 December 2025. Over these three months, a total of 122 new Parliamentary Questions (PQs) were published and 132 Commission Answers were made available, based on the provided weekly reports. The quarter was dominated by discussions on medicines regulation and supply chain security, including persistent concerns over shortages and ongoing scrutiny of the pharmaceutical package and transparency in vaccine procurement. Other dominant narratives included debates on public health and prevention strategies, with a strong focus on tobacco control, substance use, and cancer prevention, and the resilience of health systems and ensuring equitable access to care, particularly regarding workforce shortages and regional disparities. Finally, there was significant parliamentary focus on the intersection of health with environmental and trade policies, especially concerning food safety standards for imports and the regulation of chemicals and pesticides.
Throughout Q4, parliamentary scrutiny of medicines regulation was intense and multifaceted. A primary concern was the persistent issue of medicine shortages, with MEPs from various political groups repeatedly questioning the Commission on its strategy to increase EU production, reduce dependency on third countries, and strengthen prevention tools, including the potential for an EU-level stockpile. The effectiveness of the new pharmaceutical package also came under fire, with questions raised about whether data protection extensions could prolong monopolies and whether the criteria for ‘unmet medical need’ were sufficiently clear.
The legacy of the COVID-19 pandemic continued to drive questions on transparency and governance, particularly the ‘Pfizergate’ affair. MEPs persistently sought access to text messages between the Commission President and Pfizer’s CEO, questioning the Commission’s record-keeping policies and its refusal to disclose the correspondence. The regulation of medical devices was another key topic, with MEPs highlighting the need for a revision of the MDR to reduce administrative burdens and ensure uniform interpretation across Member States to avoid market access inequalities.
Key Questions This Quarter
❓ Tackling medicine shortages in Europe
In a question published on 16.12.2025, Anthony Smith (The Left) highlights the worsening issue of medicine shortages. The question asks the Commission about its plans to increase industrial production to reduce dependency, tighten monitoring of industry pricing, and strengthen prevention tools, including the potential creation of an EU stockpile of medicines. A response from the Commission is pending. (E-004765/2025).
❓ Pharma package weaknesses
Loucas Fourlas (PPE) submitted this question, published on 17.12.2025, questioning the effectiveness of the ‘pharma package’. The MEP raises concerns about data protection extensions potentially prolonging monopolies, the lack of mandatory EU production mechanisms for essential medicines, and the unclear criteria for assessing ‘unmet medical need’. A response from the Commission is pending. (E-004896/2025).
❗ Commission confirms it holds no text messages from President’s Pfizer talks
In a response published on 17.09.2025, Commissioner Šefčovič confirmed the Commission did not appeal a General Court ruling regarding access to text messages between President von der Leyen and Pfizer’s CEO. He stated that on 28 July 2025, the Commission adopted a new decision providing a more detailed explanation as to why it does not hold documents of the requested type, reiterating its commitment to transparency and its record-keeping policy. (E-002812/25, Bert-Jan Ruissen, ECR).
The resilience of national health systems and the well-being of the healthcare workforce were central themes this quarter. MEPs frequently raised alarms about systemic failures, understaffing, and deteriorating working conditions in several Member States, with a particular focus on Greece and Italy. Questions highlighted the impact of staff shortages on patient safety and called on the Commission to strengthen enforcement of the Working Time Directive for doctors. The Commission, in its responses, often reiterated that the organisation of health services is a Member State competence but pointed to EU support mechanisms like the EU4Health programme and Cohesion Policy funds to upskill professionals and improve infrastructure.
Access to care was another major focus, with numerous questions addressing regional inequalities in access to specialised services, such as cancer treatment and radiotherapy equipment in Spain. The implementation of the Cross-Border Healthcare Directive was also scrutinised, with MEPs pointing to complex procedures that deter patients from seeking treatment abroad and calling for simplification. The recognition of professional qualifications for emerging roles like genetic counselling and established professions like chiropractic was also debated as a key element of workforce mobility and patient access.
Key Questions This Quarter
❓ Safety and protection of healthcare professionals
In a question published on 23.12.2025, MEPs Anna Maria Cisint, Silvia Sardone, Isabella Tovaglieri, and Aldo Patriciello (PfE) highlight a significant increase in assaults on healthcare workers. They ask the Commission if it will promote coordinated European monitoring of such attacks and if specific resources should be allocated for prevention and safety training for healthcare staff. A response from the Commission is pending. (E-004510/2025).
❓ Access to radiotherapy equipment in Valencia
Leire Pajín, Sandra Gómez López, and Nicolás González Casares (S&D) submitted this question, published on 17.12.2025, concerning significant delays in commissioning radiotherapy equipment in Valencia, Spain. The MEPs highlight that only one of three purchased machines is operational, creating inequalities in access to cancer treatment. They ask the Commission how it monitors and addresses regional inequalities and what instruments it can use when public procurement delays exacerbate such disparities. A response from the Commission is pending. (E-004853/2025).
❗ Patients’ rights as regards cross-border healthcare
In a response published on 21.11.2025, Commissioner Várhelyi stated that the Commission will present a recent CJEU judgment on cross-border healthcare reimbursement to Member States to ensure best practice. The Commission periodically monitors the implementation of the Cross-Border Healthcare Directive and exchanges information with national authorities, but has no plans for new legislative measures before the next implementation report in 2027. (E-003566/25, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, PPE).
Public health and prevention remained a high-priority area, with a wide range of topics under discussion. Tobacco control was a dominant theme, with MEPs questioning the delay in the revision of the Tobacco Products Directive and the Tobacco Advertising Directive. The regulation of novel products, particularly e-cigarettes and their marketing to young people, was a recurring concern. The Commission confirmed it is evaluating the legislative framework and that findings will inform future steps.
The threat from substance use also featured prominently, with a cross-party call for a ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public and pointed questions about the EU’s response to the rise of synthetic opioids like nitazenes. In response, the Commission highlighted the intensified activities of the EU Drugs Agency (EUDA) and a new EU Drugs Strategy. Cancer prevention was another key focus, with questions on the implementation of screening programmes, the promotion of carcinogenic products like processed meat, and the regulation of sunbeds. Mental health, particularly among young people, and the impact of social media were also addressed, with the Commission pointing to the Digital Services Act and the ‘Healthier Together’ initiative as key policy responses.
Key Questions This Quarter
❓ Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public
In an oral question published on 11.12.2025, a large cross-party group of MEPs led by Laurent Castillo (PPE) calls for a ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public. Citing rising recreational use, severe health effects, and fatal accidents, the MEPs ask if the Commission will commit to proposing the addition of nitrous oxide to Annex XVII of the REACH Regulation to prohibit its placing on the market for public consumption. A response from the Commission is pending. (O-000046/2025).
❗ EU response to the threat of nitazenes
In a response published on 23.12.2025, Commissioner Brunner confirmed the Commission is aware of the threat posed by nitazenes, a type of synthetic opioid. He stated that the EU Drugs Agency (EUDA) has intensified its activities, publishing a threat assessment report and establishing a network of forensic laboratories. The Commission presented a new EU Drugs Strategy and Action Plan in December 2025 to address the challenges of synthetic drugs. (E-004345/2025).
❗ Regulation of e-cigarettes
In a reply published on 17.12.2025, Commissioner Várhelyi outlined that the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) regulates several aspects of e-cigarettes but leaves rules on flavours to Member States. The Commission is currently evaluating the TPD, and the findings will inform future legislative steps, particularly concerning young people’s access to novel nicotine products. (E-004021/2025, Tobiasz Bocheński, ECR).
Discussions on digital health this quarter centred on the development of key EU-wide initiatives and the crucial issue of data protection. The Commission provided updates on the digitalisation of the European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) as part of the European Social Security Pass (ESSPASS) initiative, confirming it is considering approaches that ensure accessibility for persons with disabilities. The creation of a European network of AI-powered advanced screening centres was also highlighted as a flagship initiative under the Apply AI Strategy, with the Commission emphasizing that all systems must comply with the AI Act and GDPR.
MEPs raised significant questions regarding patient rights over their personal health data, particularly in the context of the forthcoming European Health Data Space (EHDS). Scrutiny focused on whether patients can prohibit the forwarding of their data and what happens to data transferred to the EHDS, reflecting underlying concerns about data governance and individual control in an increasingly digitalised healthcare environment.
Key Questions This Quarter
❗ Digital European Health Insurance Card (EHIC)
In a response published on 16.12.2025, Executive Vice-President Mînzatu confirmed that a digitalised EHIC is an objective of the European Social Security Pass (ESSPASS) initiative. The Commission is examining pilot project outcomes, considering two approaches: one using the European Digital Identity Wallet, which is accessible for persons with disabilities, and another using a QR-code format. (E-004243/2025).
❓ Personal health data and patient rights
This question from Gerald Hauser (PfE), published on 16.12.2025, asks if EU patients can prohibit doctors from forwarding their health data under GDPR, if the right to opt-out has been or will be revoked, and what happens to data transferred to the European Health Data Space (EHDS). A response from the Commission is pending. (E-004761/2025).
The financing of EU health policy and ensuring equitable access to care were key topics of debate in Q4. Significant attention was paid to the Commission’s proposal for the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2028-2034, with MEPs expressing concern that public health funding was being absorbed into a broader Competitiveness Fund without a dedicated successor to the EU4Health programme. The Commission responded by outlining its proposed funding windows for health, biotech, and health emergency preparedness.
The implementation of existing funds, particularly the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), was also under scrutiny. MEPs highlighted significant delays in the use of RRF funds for healthcare projects, such as hospital renovations in Greece, prompting the Commission to acknowledge common implementation challenges across Member States. Questions were also raised about ensuring adequate and transparent funding for flagship initiatives like Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan in the next budget cycle.
Key Questions This Quarter
❗ Health policy in the Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034
In a reply published on 17.12.2025, Commissioner Várhelyi outlined the Commission’s proposal for the MFF 2028-2034. It includes a proposed European Competitiveness Fund with a EUR 20.4 billion policy window for Health, Biotech, Agriculture and Bioeconomy, an additional EUR 19.65 billion for health-related research under Horizon Europe, and EUR 10.7 billion for a new Union Civil Protection Mechanism and health emergency preparedness. (E-004143/2025, Dimitris Tsiodras, PPE).
❓ Funding for Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan in the next MFF
In a question published on 12.12.2025, MEPs from The Left group ask if the Commission will propose a ring-fenced budget of at least EUR 2 billion in the next MFF for 2028–2034 for Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan, how it will ensure key public health objectives are not diluted, and what monitoring mechanism will be in place to track expenditures and results. A response from the Commission is pending. (E-004760/2025).
The intersection of health with environmental, agricultural, and trade policies was a highly active area of parliamentary debate this quarter. The EU-Mercosur trade agreement was a major point of contention, with multiple questions raising concerns about the safety of food imports, particularly beef from Brazil. MEPs questioned the reliability of Brazil’s control systems for antibiotics and hormones and asked if the Commission was prepared to suspend import concessions on public health grounds. The Commission maintained that all imports must comply with the EU’s high sanitary standards.
The regulation of chemicals and pesticides also remained a top priority. MEPs scrutinised the Commission’s proposals on New Genomic Techniques (NGTs), the restriction of lead in ammunition, and the potential classification of talc as a carcinogen. The Commission’s withdrawal of its proposal on the sustainable use of pesticides did not end the debate, with MEPs continuing to push for measures to reduce pesticide use through other means, such as the Common Agricultural Policy. The health impacts of climate change, including heat-related deaths and the spread of vector-borne diseases, were also addressed, with the Commission highlighting its monitoring and preparedness efforts.
Key Questions This Quarter
❓ Quality control of beef from MERCOSUR countries
Anna Zalewska (ECR) submitted this question on 17.12.2025, raising concerns about beef production standards in Brazil. Citing reports of uncontrolled antibiotic sales and unreliable cattle traceability, the MEP asks if the Commission will verify production conditions and if it is prepared to suspend beef import concessions on public health grounds. A response from the Commission is pending. (E-004883/2025).
❗ Potential classification of talc as a carcinogen
In a response published on 10.12.2025, Executive Vice-President Séjourné addressed the status of talc. He noted that the European Chemicals Agency’s Risk Assessment Committee has recommended classifying talc as a presumed carcinogen (category 1B). The Commission will now analyse this opinion and consult with Member State experts to decide if a harmonised classification is appropriate. (E-004190/2025).
❗ Regulation of New Genomic Techniques (NGTs)
Responding on 17.12.2025, Commissioner Várhelyi stated that the Commission’s proposal on NGTs aims to maintain a high level of health and environmental protection. It proposes two regulatory pathways: category 1 NGT plants, equivalent to conventional plants, would follow the same rules, while category 2 plants with more complex modifications would remain subject to a full GMO risk assessment. (E-004209/2025).
As the quarter concludes, several key policy questions remain on the Commission’s agenda, setting the stage for debates in early 2026. Notable pending responses relate to the detailed strategy for tackling persistent medicine shortages, the future regulatory framework for novel tobacco and nicotine products amid rising youth consumption, and the specific measures to ensure food imports under trade agreements like EU-Mercosur meet EU health and safety standards. Furthermore, the future funding and structure of major initiatives like Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan and the broader European Health Union under the next MFF are expected to be central to parliamentary scrutiny in the coming months.
All Parliamentary Questions and Commission Answers are accessible via Policy-Insider.AI.
