Overview
This report covers Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and Commission replies published from 07.06.2026 till 14.06.2026. The dominant policy areas include rigorous enforcement of the Digital Services Act (DSA), the balancing of data protection with law enforcement capabilities, emerging privacy concerns surrounding AI-enabled hardware, and upcoming consumer protection measures such as the Digital Fairness Act. Institutionally, the European Commission positions itself as a proactive enforcer, frequently citing ongoing formal proceedings and infringement actions to demonstrate regulatory resolve. For public-affairs and advocacy professionals, these developments underscore a critical transition from legislative drafting to aggressive enforcement, signaling where regulatory scrutiny and compliance pressures will be concentrated in the coming months.
❗ Commission Escalates DSA Enforcement Against Member States
In Parliamentary Question P-001777/2026, the Commission was asked about Spain’s failure to empower its Digital Service Coordinator (DSC). In a response on 10 June 2026, Executive Vice-President Virkkunen confirmed that the Commission has referred Spain to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for failing to fulfil its obligations under Articles 51 and 52 of the DSA, highlighting the Commission’s strict approach to national compliance.
❗ Defending the Digital Rulebook Against Foreign Censorship Claims
In Parliamentary Question E-001526/2026, Erik Kaliňák (NI) asked how the Commission is addressing a US House Judiciary Committee report alleging the EU seeks to censor American platforms. Replying on 12 June 2026, Executive Vice-President Virkkunen firmly rebutted the allegations, asserting that the DSA inherently protects freedom of expression and that enforcing democratically adopted EU legislation is a sovereign right not up for discussion.
❗ Formal Proceedings Initiated Over Deceptive Financial Ads
In Parliamentary Question P-001840/2026, the Commission was asked about the proliferation of deceptive financial ads. Responding on 10 June 2026, Executive Vice-President Virkkunen confirmed that the Commission has opened formal proceedings against Meta for potentially breaching the DSA regarding deceptive advertisements. The Commission also sent requests for information to Google Play and Google Search, signaling intense regulatory scrutiny on ad repositories.
❓ MEPs Press Commission on Financial Scam Advertisements
In Parliamentary Question E-002217/2026, Adnan Dibrani (S&D) and a cross-party group asked the Commission how it assesses evidence from consumer organisation BEUC regarding the failure of Meta, TikTok, and Google to remove scam ads. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ MEPs Probe Automated Vetting Processes on Platforms
In Parliamentary Question P-002254/2026, Tomislav Sokol (PPE) queried whether multi-year automated platform vetting processes without human review violate the P2B Regulation and the DSA. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Compliance of Meta with Political Advertising Rules Questioned
In Parliamentary Question P-002122/2026, Sandro Gozi (Renew) and Martin Hojsík (Renew) asked about Meta’s compliance with EU rules following reports that sponsored political content continued despite platform suspensions. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Accountability for Streaming Fraud
In Parliamentary Question E-002243/2026, Nikola Minchev (Renew) and a cross-party group asked how the Commission ensures Very Large Online Search Engines (VLOSEs) mitigate streaming fraud on music platforms under the DSA. A response from the Commission is pending.
❗ Commission Prepares New Legislative Proposal for Europol
In Parliamentary Question E-001320/2026, the Commission was asked about Europol’s operational agility. Responding on 11 June 2026, Commissioner Brunner announced an upcoming legislative proposal to streamline Europol’s framework, aiming to strike a balance between advanced data analytical needs and the oversight of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS).
❗ Entry/Exit System Security Delegated to eu-LISA
In Parliamentary Question E-000772/2026, Mariusz Kamiński (ECR) highlighted reports of a Russian FSB-licensed company’s involvement in the EU Entry/Exit System. Commissioner Brunner replied on 12 June 2026 that the issue falls strictly under the remit of the eu-LISA agency, deferring a detailed response to them.
❗ Commission Monitors Security Threats from al-Hol Camp Outflows
In Parliamentary Question E-000890/2026, the Commission was questioned about the outflow of individuals linked to the Islamic State from the al-Hol camp. Responding on 9 June 2026, Commissioner Brunner stated that the Commission is closely monitoring the situation. The Commission highlighted the use of the Schengen Information System (SIS), the upcoming Screening Regulation, and Europol’s support to Member States in combating terrorism, while noting that national security remains a Member State competence.
❓ Security Flaws in Europol Information Systems Questioned
In Parliamentary Question E-002186/2026, Özlem Demirel (The Left) asked the Commission about the current state of security within Europol’s information systems following reports of data protection gaps and unresolved recommendations from the European Data Protection Supervisor. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Scrutiny on Spyware and the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES)
In Parliamentary Question E-002239/2026, Saskia Bricmont (Verts/ALE) and others asked whether the Commission will apply the revised EDES to exclude cyber-surveillance and spyware companies from EU funding due to fundamental rights breaches. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Participation of EU Officials in Security Fair Questioned
In Parliamentary Question E-002240/2026, Saskia Bricmont (Verts/ALE) and a cross-party group questioned the participation of EU officials in the ISS World Europe security fair, an event sponsored by spyware developers. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Surveillance of Elected Officials
In Parliamentary Question P-002126/2026, Alvise Pérez (NI) asked the Commission if surveillance of MEPs by national intelligence services without judicial authorisation is compatible with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A response from the Commission is pending.
❗ European Digital Identity Wallets Affirm Privacy by Design
In Parliamentary Question E-001241/2026, the Commission was queried on the European Competitiveness Fund and digital transitions. On 8 June 2026, Executive Vice-President Séjourné clarified that the European Digital Identity Wallets (EUDIWs) are strictly governed by the GDPR, ensuring users have full control over data sharing and offering a voluntary pseudonym function.
❓ GDPR Obligations for Smart Glasses Users Questioned
In Parliamentary Question E-002205/2026, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú (Renew) asked about GDPR obligations for uploaders of non-consensual footage recorded via camera-enabled smart glasses. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Privacy and Safety Implications of AI-Enabled Wearables
In Parliamentary Question E-002321/2026, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová (Renew) focuses on the gender-based safety impacts of AI-enabled smart glasses and asks if the Commission will issue specific guidance. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Corporate Influence on Data Centre Environmental Metrics
In Parliamentary Question E-002307/2026, Lynn Boylan (The Left) asked the Commission to justify confidentiality clauses in Delegated Act (EU) 2024/1364 regarding data centre environmental metrics, alleging the clauses were transposed from tech lobbying documents. A response from the Commission is pending.
❗ Tackling Unlicensed Gambling and the Digital Fairness Act
In Parliamentary Question E-001475/2026, Sabine Verheyen (PPE) raised the issue of content creators promoting unlicensed gambling. Executive Vice-President Virkkunen responded on 12 June 2026, noting that the protection of minors as consumers is a core priority of the upcoming Digital Fairness Act, which will specifically address unfair influencer marketing. The Commission is currently investigating app stores’ age-restriction mechanisms.
❗ Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Rights
Addressing dynamic ticket pricing for the FIFA World Cup 2026 in Parliamentary Question E-001336/2026, Executive Vice-President Ribera confirmed on 9 June 2026 that dynamic pricing is not inherently prohibited. However, she noted that the planned Digital Fairness Act may introduce rules targeting misleading starting prices and opaque virtual queues.
❗ Youth Advisory Board on Social Media Impact
In Parliamentary Question E-000795/2026, Sibylle Berg (NI) requested details on the President’s Youth Advisory Board. On 11 June 2026, Commissioner Micallef confirmed the board’s inaugural focus was on social media’s impact on youth, digital well-being, and age verification, feeding directly into a special panel on child online safety.
❗ AI Evaluated for Societal Impact in EU Funding
In Parliamentary Question E-001003/2026, Commissioner Zaharieva explained on 8 June 2026 how the European Innovation Council assesses AI proposals. The Commission evaluates societal and ethical aspects of AI solutions under its impact criteria, supported by initiatives like the Resource for AI Science in Europe (RAISE).
❗ Commission Highlights Frameworks Protecting Minors Online
In a response on 9 June 2026, Executive Vice-President Virkkunen outlined the EU’s comprehensive framework for protecting minors online, addressing issues raised in Parliamentary Question E-001498/2026. The Commission emphasized obligations under the Digital Services Act (DSA) for very large online platforms to mitigate risks to minors, alongside complementary initiatives like the Better Internet for Kids Strategy and the upcoming revision of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive.
❓ MEPs Seek Clarity on AI’s Impact on the Labour Market
In Parliamentary Question E-002231/2026, Loucas Fourlas (PPE) asked the Commission how it assesses the impact of artificial intelligence on the European labour market. The question also probes what measures are planned to retrain workers affected by automation. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Regulation of Short-Term Rentals in Tensioned Housing Markets
In Parliamentary Question E-002274/2026, Jaume Asens Llodrà (Verts/ALE) asked whether the Commission intends to include binding measures on tourist rentals in tensioned areas within its upcoming European housing plan. The inquiry highlights the pressure of short-term rentals on residential stock. A response from the Commission is pending.
The Commission’s responses from this period indicate a definitive shift toward aggressive, formalized enforcement of the Digital Services Act (DSA). By explicitly referencing active infringement procedures against Member States (such as Spain) and formal proceedings against Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) like Meta, the Commission frames itself as a rigorous regulator willing to utilize its full legal arsenal. This narrative is further reinforced by its robust defense of the EU Digital Rulebook against external geopolitical criticism, positioning EU digital sovereignty and freedom of expression as non-negotiable standards.
A secondary cross-cutting theme is the strategic bridging of existing regulatory gaps through upcoming legislative frameworks. The Commission repeatedly signals the forthcoming Digital Fairness Act as its primary vehicle for modernizing consumer protection, specifically targeting influencer marketing, deceptive pricing, and the protection of minors online. Simultaneously, in the law enforcement domain, the Commission acknowledges friction between data-heavy operational demands and privacy oversight, indicating that the upcoming Europol legislative revision will attempt to streamline this balance.
Overall, the material reveals a digital policy landscape transitioning from the creation of broad legislative mandates to highly targeted, sector-specific enforcement and refinement. For public-affairs professionals, this suggests that advocacy efforts must increasingly focus on compliance interpretation, the operational mechanics of the DSA, and shaping the foundational elements of the impending Digital Fairness Act.
All Parliamentary Questions and Commission Answers are accessible via Policy-Insider.AI.
