Overview
This report covers parliamentary questions (PQs) published during the period from 26.07.2026 to 02.08.2026. The documents reflect intense parliamentary scrutiny across several core areas of the European energy transition and climate policy. Key themes include the regulatory and financial impacts of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), the resilience and funding of critical energy infrastructure and grids, supply chain vulnerabilities regarding critical raw materials, and the broader geopolitical dimensions of energy security in the face of ongoing global tensions. In total, this report covers 20 PQs, of which 9 have been answered by the Commission and 11 remain pending.
❓ Decommissioning of wind turbines and covering dismantling costs
In E-003081/2026, submitted on 22 July 2026 by Marcin Sypniewski (ESN), the Commission is asked to address the financial risks associated with the decommissioning of wind turbines. The MEP seeks clarity on whether current EU law permits Member States to require financial guarantees from investors to cover dismantling and site restoration costs, and whether the Commission plans to issue minimum standards on investors’ financial liability. A response from the Commission is pending.
❗ Regulation of waste heat and cold in Italy
In P-002182/26, submitted on 29 May 2026 by Dario Tamburrano (The Left), concerns are raised over whether Italy correctly transposed the Renewable Energy Directive (RED) regarding the classification of heat generated from municipal solid waste incineration as renewable waste heat. In a response on 24 July 2026, Commissioner Jørgensen clarified that heat from a process primarily designed to co-produce heat and electricity cannot qualify as a by-product. He stated the Commission will assess the compatibility of Italy’s January 2026 legislative decree with the RED and will address any non-conformity directly with Italian authorities.
❓ Risks of new electrification targets on infrastructure and citizens
In E-003117/2026, submitted on 24 July 2026 by Ioan-Rareş Bogdan (PPE), the Commission is challenged on the feasibility of its plan to double electricity use by 2040. The question highlights the disproportionate pressure on Eastern European grids, the risk of energy poverty, and asks what targeted funding mechanisms are available for modernising transmission networks without bankrupting national budgets. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Hybrid threats and foreign-controlled charging infrastructure
In E-003112/2026, submitted on 23 July 2026 by Christine Anderson (ESN), the focus is on the cybersecurity risks of foreign-controlled electric vehicle charging infrastructure, specifically referencing the Chinese-founded company XCharge. The MEP questions whether EU law under the NIS 2 Directive adequately requires assessments of ultimate control, data access, and remote software updates, and asks if supplier-security restrictions will be applied similarly to solar inverters. A response from the Commission is pending.
❗ Development of an internal market for CO2
In E-002090/2026, submitted on an unspecified date by an unspecified Member of the European Parliament, the Commission is asked about liability and the development of an internal market and infrastructure for CO2. In a response on 31 July 2026, Commissioner Hoekstra noted that a legislative proposal for CO2 Markets and Infrastructure is being prepared for adoption at the end of 2026. He also highlighted that the Innovation Fund is de-risking 60 Industrial Carbon Management projects with over EUR 6 billion€6BCited figure in grants.
❓ Infringement procedure against all Member States for failure to transpose the EPBD
In E-003045/2026, submitted on 17 July 2026 by Anna Maria Cisint (PfE) and co-signatories, the Commission is questioned over its decision to launch infringement procedures against all 27 Member States for failing to transpose the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). The MEPs ask whether this collective failure indicates that the directive’s design is unrealistic and should be overhauled or repealed rather than strictly enforced. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Impact of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive on construction and housing prices
In E-003055/2026, submitted on 17 July 2026 by Christian Ehler (PPE), the Commission is asked to provide estimates on the investments required by each Member State to comply with the EPBD. The MEP requests data on how these requirements will affect the average construction, rental, and purchasing prices of residential and non-residential buildings per square metre. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ European strategy for sustainable cooling of buildings
In E-003040/2026, submitted on 17 July 2026 by Nadine Morano (PPE), the Commission is asked if it intends to support Member States in developing sustainable air-conditioning solutions and adapting electricity grids to meet the growing demand for cooling driven by intensifying heatwaves. A response from the Commission is pending.
❗ Extension of derogations from the stability pact to energy investments
In E-001827/26, submitted on 5 May 2026 by Anna Maria Cisint (PfE), the Commission is asked whether it will consider extending the stability pact’s flexibility clauses to investments in the energy sector to protect industrial competitiveness. In a response on 31 July 2026, Commissioner Dombrovskis confirmed that measures strengthening structural resilience and accelerating the transition away from fossil fuels may benefit from existing fiscal flexibility, capped at 0.3% per year with a cumulative maximum of 0.6% of GDP until 2028.
❗ EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Review
In P-002697/2026, submitted on an unspecified date by an unspecified Member of the European Parliament, the Commission is asked about support for industrial decarbonisation under the revised EU ETS. In a response on 31 July 2026, Commissioner Hoekstra noted that the comprehensive review of the EU ETS was adopted on 17 July 2026. He highlighted that the review includes the creation of the Industrial Decarbonisation Bank and an ETS Investment Booster to provide timely support on a first-come, first-served basis.
❓ Transparency and effectiveness in the Greek support scheme for energy-intensive companies
In E-003047/2026, submitted on 17 July 2026 by Galato Alexandraki (ECR), the Commission is asked about the approval of a EUR 405 million€405MCited figure Greek State aid scheme to cut electricity levies for energy-intensive companies. The MEP questions how the Commission will ensure the scheme genuinely supports production and employment, rather than acting as a horizontal subsidy, and whether smaller businesses and agricultural cooperatives can be covered. A response from the Commission is pending.
❗ Need to protect European silicon producers
In E-001811/26, submitted on 4 May 2026 by Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE), concerns are raised over the vulnerability of Spain’s only silicon plant in Sabón due to cheap imports from China and Angola. The MEP asks how safeguard measures will be tailored to protect jobs. In a response on 30 July 2026, Commissioner Šefčovič stated that silicon was not included in the November 2025 safeguard measures as it did not meet the legal conditions, but the Commission continues to monitor the situation and remains open to exploring trade defence instruments if conditions are met.
❓ EU funding for the Jadar lithium project in Serbia
In E-002916/2026, submitted on 14 July 2026 by Martin Günther (The Left), the Commission is asked to provide transparency regarding any direct or indirect EU financial or technical support committed or disbursed for the Jadar lithium project in Serbia. The MEP requests details on the specific EU programmes used and the beneficiaries involved. A response from the Commission is pending.
❗ Mechanism to restrict or tax copper waste and scrap exports
In E-002508/26, submitted on 17 June 2026 by Thomas Pellerin-Carlin (S&D), the Commission is asked if it plans to propose a mechanism to restrict or tax copper waste and scrap exports to third countries to ensure adequate supply for EU industries. In a response on 29 July 2026, Commissioner Šefčovič noted that while surveillance was introduced, the small export increase of 10.8% between January and May 2026 does not currently warrant a trade measure or legislative initiative, though monitoring continues.
❗ Ensuring sufficient accredited verifier capacity for CBAM compliance
In E-002345/26, submitted on 8 June 2026 by Peter Agius (PPE), the Commission is questioned on the availability of accredited third-party verifiers for the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). In a response on 30 July 2026, Commissioner Hoekstra clarified that accreditation is currently open in 11 Member States. He stated that the first CBAM verifiers should be accredited by September 2026, ensuring sufficient capacity ahead of the first declaration deadline in September 2027.
❗ ETS Benchmarks and CBAM extension to coke
In E-002302/2026, submitted on an unspecified date by an unspecified Member of the European Parliament, the Commission is asked about ETS benchmarks and the potential extension of CBAM. In a response on 3 August 2026, Commissioner Hoekstra explained that the ETS benchmark update methodology is based on the actual performance of the most efficient installations. He also noted that while materials like refinery products and organic chemicals are prioritised for CBAM review, it is too early to say whether coke will be included in future scope extensions.
❓ Sustainable aviation fuel and trade measures
In E-002319/2026, submitted on 5 June 2026 by Regina Doherty (PPE), the Commission is asked if it is considering a request to temporarily suspend trade measures on US-origin sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). The MEP questions why US-origin SAF was brought within the scope of existing trade defence measures on biodiesel without a dedicated investigation, given its importance for meeting ReFuelEU Aviation obligations. A response from the Commission is pending.
❗ Role of eFuels and CO2 emission standards
In E-001821/2026, submitted on an unspecified date by an unspecified Member of the European Parliament, the Commission is asked about investments in electrofuels (eFuels) and CO2 standards. In a response on 31 July 2026, Commissioner Jørgensen highlighted that the Commission aims to accelerate investment in eSAF production through the Sustainable Transport Investment Plan and Clean Trade and Investment Partnerships. He added that the recent proposal amending CO2 emission standards for cars maintains a strong market signal for zero-emission vehicles while providing manufacturers flexibility.
❓ Gas storage levels ahead of winter
In E-002813/2026, submitted on 8 July 2026 by Fernand Kartheiser (NI), the Commission is asked to assess the current level of gas storage across the EU and whether the present injection trajectory is sufficient to meet winter targets. The MEP also questions how the Commission is securing gas imports at competitive prices amid geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and sanctions on Russia. A response from the Commission is pending.
❓ Security of energy supply and geopolitical risks
In E-002995/2026, submitted on 15 July 2026 by Moritz Körner (Renew), the Commission is asked for its contingency plans regarding a potential simultaneous disruption of oil and gas supplies from Russia, the Gulf region (Strait of Hormuz), and the United States (export restrictions). The MEP requests details on the EU’s strategic reserves, alternative transport routes, and ongoing discussions with the US administration to prevent massive price increases. A response from the Commission is pending.
